Can Your Medical History Effect A Workers Compensation Claim?
Have you ever asked Can Your Medical History Effect A Workers Compensation Claim? There are many things to consider when filing a Workers’ Compensation claim, but your medical history is a major one. An individual’s medical history can greatly affect the outcome of a claim, giving you insight into the severity of any injuries and the role of any pre existing conditions that may have worsened because of the workplace incident.
In this article, our workers comp lawyer at Tomack Law, PLLC, discuss how an employee’s medical history can affect a workers’ compensation claim and why it can sometimes be difficult to associate a workplace incident with an injury.
Understanding the “Eggshell Claimant” Doctrine
An “eggshell claimant” is the concept that individuals must be taken as they are, in whatever state of health, regardless of history. In New York, transparency about your medical history is vital. If you did not disclose a prior injury, you risk losing your case. For example, if you had a previous back injury, but don’t report it, when you are filing a claim for a new back injury, this could be used against you.
Relevant injuries need to be disclosed and only the relevant body parts be given a HIPAA release. Over disclosure can include signing an unsigned HIPAA release with your physician which can expose your entire medical history to insurers, who may be able to deny you benefits unconstitutionally.
The Importance of Disclosing Only Relevant Medical History
In case of workers’ compensation claim, only injuries related to your case should be focussed on. If your claim involves a back injury, you do not have to disclose that you have aching feet from a foot fracture that occurred years ago.
Key Tip: Limit HIPAA authorizations to specific body parts affected by your workplace injury. A blanket HIPAA release allows insurers to access irrelevant medical history, potentially leading to delays or denials based on unrelated past injuries.